Library / Commentaries and Disputations on Genesis, Volume I

Book Two — the heavens and the stars

BENITO PERERA'S COMMENTARIES ON GENESIS, BOOK TWO. Which is concerning the Heavens and the heavenly bodies according to sacred Scripture, and concerning astrological Divination. PREFACE

LatineEnglish

BENITO PERERA'S COMMENTARIES ON GENESIS, BOOK TWO. Which is concerning the Heavens and the heavenly bodies according to sacred Scripture, and concerning astrological Divination. PREFACE.1

BENEDICTI PERERII COMMENTARIORUM IN GENESIM LIBER SECUNDUS. Qui est de Caelis et astris secundum sacram Scripturam, et de Divinatione astrologica. PRAEFATIO.

QUAERIT B. Augustinus cap. 9 lib. 2 De Genesi ad litteram cur Auctores sacrarum litterarum non aperte et enucleate docuerunt quaenam esset caeli natura, qualis figura, quanta magnitudo et numerus orbium caelestium, qui motus, quae caelestis motus efficiens causa, quam ingens et varia syderum potentia, efficacitas, aliaque huius generis multa, quae tam Philosophi quam Mathematici sollerter investigando arguteque tractando immortalem ingenii laudem et nominis memoriam promeruerunt. Ad hanc quaestionem brevissime respondet Augustinus: Spiritum sanctum, cuius illi afflatu et impulsu ad scribendum incitabantur, et a quo in scribendo regebantur atque moderabantur, noluisse huiusmodi res inseri et immisceri Sacris litteris, quod haberent curiosam magis quam utilem cognitionem, et futurum esset ut homines (quae est humani ingenii ad deteriora proclivitas) in earum rerum tractatione, posthabitis utilioribus, toti versarentur atque occuparentur. Nisi enim hoc secutus esset Moses, quam multa ille hoc loco de rebus caelestibus universaque natura mirabiliter disputare ac philosophari potuisset! cum ex ea concione B. Stephani quam in cap. 7 Historiae Apostolicae refert Lucas satis constet eum in omni sapientia Aegyptiorum fuisse eruditum et excellenter versatum. Nonne Salomon, ut in 3 lib. Regum cap. 4 et in lib. Sapientiae cap. 7 scriptum est, omnium rerum naturalium tam caelestium quam quae sub caelo sunt cognitionem habuit, quam ullus sapientum huius saeculi, et ampliorem et multo certiorem? Hanc tamen eius tantam doctrinam et sapientiam litteris commendari et ad nostram notitiam pervenire noluit Deus, ne scilicet homines, quorum satis per se pronum est ad res vanas ac futiles ingenium, supervacanea, nec quicquam ad praesentem vitam bene informandam aeternamque...
The blessed AUGUSTINE asks, in chapter 9 of book 2 On Genesis according to the Letter, why the authors of the sacred writings did not openly and explicitly teach what was the nature of the heaven, of what figure, how great its magnitude, and the number of the celestial orbs, what their motion, what the efficient cause of celestial motion, how vast and various the power and efficacy of the heavenly bodies, and many other things of this kind, by which both Philosophers and Mathematicians, in cleverly investigating and subtly treating them, have merited undying praise for their genius and lasting remembrance of their name. To this question Augustine answers very briefly: that the Holy Spirit, by whose inspiration and impulse they were stirred to write, and by whom they were ruled and guided in writing, did not wish things of this kind to be inserted and mingled with the Sacred writings, because they would furnish a knowledge more curious than useful, and it would come to pass that men (such is the human mind's bent toward worse things), in the treatment of such matters, with more useful things set aside, would be wholly engaged and occupied. For had not Moses followed this course, how many things in this place about the celestial bodies and about universal nature he could have marvelously disputed and philosophized! since from that speech of the blessed Stephen which Luke reports in chapter 7 of the Apostolic History, it is sufficiently evident that he was learned and excellently versed in all the wisdom of the Egyptians. Did not Solomon—as it is written in the third book of Kings, chapter 4, and in the book of Wisdom, chapter 7—have a knowledge of all natural things, both celestial and those that are beneath heaven, both ampler and far surer than any of the wise men of this age? Yet God did not wish this so great learning and wisdom of his to be committed to writing and to come to our knowledge, lest, namely, men—whose disposition is of itself prone enough to vain and futile things—should superfluously, and to no profit for the right ordering of the present life and the...2
...que adipiscendam collatura, plus aequo consectarentur; utiliora vero, et emendationi vitiorum bonorumque morum institutioni atque immortalis gloriae consecutioni maxime profutura, minori studio curaque complecterentur. Multa tamen, eaque praeclara, passim in Sacris libris ex scientia rerum caelestium, plurimis ante Philosophos et Mathematicos saeculis, quasi quaedam praeiacta semina reperiuntur. Nec est profecto quicquam in syderali disciplina aut necessariis rationibus conclusum, aut manifestis exploratum et compertum experimentis, quod divinae Scripturae contrarium vel dissonum sit; quin pleraque doctrinae astrologicae decreta cum ea mire congruunt atque consentiunt. Quapropter institui scribere librum hunc de Caelis et astris, et in eo quae difficiliores et nobiliores sunt de caelo et syderibus quaestiones eas non indiligenter secundum sacram Scripturam et doctrinam ac sententiam Patrum, adiunctis praeterea Theologicis ac Philosophicis rationibus, explicare.
...attainment of the eternal life, pursue beyond measure things that contribute nothing to it; while the more useful things, and those most profitable for the correction of vices, the establishment of good morals, and the attainment of immortal glory, they would embrace with less zeal and care. Yet many things, and those excellent, are found scattered here and there in the Sacred books from the knowledge of celestial things, cast forth, as it were, as certain seeds many ages before the Philosophers and Mathematicians. Nor indeed is there anything in the science of the stars, either concluded by necessary reasonings or explored and ascertained by manifest experiments, that is contrary or discordant to the divine Scripture; rather, very many of the decrees of astrological doctrine agree and accord with it wonderfully. Wherefore I have resolved to write this book On the Heavens and the heavenly bodies, and in it to explain, not negligently, the harder and nobler questions concerning heaven and the heavenly bodies, according to sacred Scripture and the doctrine and judgment of the Fathers, with theological and philosophical reasonings adjoined besides.3
Hae autem sunt quaestiones quas hoc volumine tractandas suscepimus. Prima, An caeli et astra sint incorruptibilis naturae. Secunda, Qualis futura sit post diem iudicii caelorum commutatio et renovatio. Tertia, De figura caeli. Quarta, De numero orbium caelestium. Quinta, An caeli seipsi sua vi naturali moveant, an moveantur ab Angelis. Sexta, An post diem iudicii omnino cessaturus sit caeli motus. Septima, An caeli et astra sint vere animata. Octava, An sydera sint actu calida. Nona, An stellae sint infixae in orbibus, eorumque tantum motu volvantur, an caelo immoto per se ipsae propriis agantur motibus, similiter ut pisces in aqua et aves per aerem motus suos peragunt. Decima, An multitudo syderum inerrantium quae sunt in octavo orbe sit mortalibus innumerabilis. Atque haec in priori parte huius libri tractabuntur. Posterior autem pars bene longam de Divinatione quae ducitur ex astris adversus Astrologos disputationem continebit.
These, then, are the questions which we have undertaken to treat in this volume. First, whether the heavens and the stars are of an incorruptible nature. Second, what shall be, after the day of judgment, the change and renovation of the heavens. Third, on the figure of heaven. Fourth, on the number of the celestial orbs. Fifth, whether the heavens move themselves by their own natural force, or are moved by Angels. Sixth, whether after the day of judgment the motion of heaven shall wholly cease. Seventh, whether the heavens and the stars are truly animate. Eighth, whether the heavenly bodies are actually hot. Ninth, whether the stars are fixed in their orbs and revolved only by the motion of these, or whether—the heaven being unmoved—they are driven by their own proper motions, just as fish in the water and birds through the air accomplish their motions. Tenth, whether the multitude of the fixed stars which are in the eighth orb is innumerable to mortals. And these will be treated in the first part of this book. But the latter part will contain a good long disputation, against the Astrologers, on the Divination which is drawn from the stars.4

Translator’s notes

  1. The title-block opening Book II (with woodcut headpiece and ornamental initial).
  2. Marginal gloss: "Cur sacri scriptores de rebus physicis mathematicisque perpauca scripserint." Augustine, De Genesi ad litteram 2.9; Acts 7:22 (Stephen on Moses's Egyptian learning); 3 Kings (1 Kings) 4:29–34; Wisdom 7:17–21 (Solomon's knowledge). Sentence continues onto the next page (catchword ‘que’).
  3. Wisdom 7; Pererius's claim of the harmony of Scripture with sound astronomy. Completes the sentence broken at the foot of the previous page.
  4. Marginal gloss: "Decem quaestiones in priori parte huius libri explicandae." The ten questions of Book II, part 1; part 2 is the disputation against astrological divination.