Library / Commentaries and Disputations on Genesis, Volume I

Book Four — the creation of the first human beings

QUESTION II. Whether the Angels concurred in any part in the procreation of man

LatineEnglish

QUESTION II. Whether the Angels concurred in any part in the procreation of man.1

QUAESTIO II. Num aliqua ex parte Angeli concurrerint ad procreationem hominis.

DE creatione quidem animae rationalis, nullo modo dubitandum est eam non potuisse ab Angelis proficisci. Cùm enim animus hominis sit immaterialis & immortalis, nec aliter quàm ex nihilo, nec ab alio, nisi à Deo creari potest. Creare enim rem ullam, ut docet Augustinus cap. 15. libri 9. de Genesi ad litteram, tam nullus Angelus potest, quàm nec se ipsum. De corpore autem primi hominis, num ad eius formationem operam suam Angeli contulerint, propterea videtur in quaestionem vocari posse, quòd omnis materia & creatura corporalis, auctore Augustino capit. 24. libri 8. de Genesi ad litteram, Angelorum voluntati & imperio subiecta sit: & quemadmodum ipsi corpora humana saepè formarunt sibíque assumpserunt, ut in his apparerent hominibus, ita corpus primi hominis fingere & figurare potuerunt.
As for the creation of the rational soul, there must be no doubt at all that it could not have proceeded from the Angels. For since the mind of man is immaterial and immortal, it can be created in no other way than from nothing, and by no other than God. For to create any thing whatever, as Augustine teaches in chapter 15 of book 9 of On Genesis according to the Letter, no Angel is able, any more than it can create its own self. But concerning the body of the first man — whether the Angels lent their labour to its formation — this seems able to be called into question on this account, that all matter and corporeal creature is (on Augustine's authority, chapter 24 of book 8 of On Genesis according to the Letter) subject to the will and command of the Angels; and just as they themselves often formed human bodies and assumed them to themselves, in order to appear in them to men, so they could fashion and figure the body of the first man.2
VERUMTAMEN, proculdubio dicendum est, corpus primi hominis nec ab Angelis formatum esse, nec formari potuisse: siquidem Angeli, cùm sint incorporei, nullam vim & potestatem habent per se generandi rem aliquam corpoream, nisi tantùm ministrando, adhibendo, & invicem coaptando causas naturales per quas corpora naturalia generari possunt: eo scilicet modo quo agricola segetes creare & vinum generare, medicus item propulsare morbos & sanitatem efficere dicitur. His enim exemplis ad idem confirmandum utitur Augustinus in cap. 15. lib. 9. de Genesi ad litteram: quo loco affirmatè dicit, neque corpus Evae ex costa Adami, nec ipsius Adami corpus ex pulvere terrae, Angelorum potestate, formatum esse: quanquam inibi non negat Augustinus aliquod ministerium in formatione corporis Adami vel Evae Angelos exhibere potuisse: quale autem fuerit illud ministerium, quis audeat, inquit, affirmare? Si igitur Angelus non potest corpus aliquod generare, nisi per naturales causas generatrices & effectrices: causa autem naturalis efficiens & formans corpus humanum, est vis illa mirabilis residens in semine virili, quam in scholis vocant virtutem formativam: haec autem ante generationem primi hominis nulla fuit, quae ab Angelis adhiberi posset: conficitur ergo, corpus primi hominis ab Angelis non potuisse formari.
NEVERTHELESS, it must beyond doubt be said that the body of the first man was neither formed by the Angels nor could be formed by them: since the Angels, being incorporeal, have no force or power of themselves to generate any corporeal thing, except only by ministering, by applying, and by fitting together one with another the natural causes through which natural bodies can be generated — in that manner, namely, in which a farmer is said to “create” crops and “generate” wine, and a physician likewise to “drive off” diseases and “effect” health. For Augustine uses these very examples to confirm the same point, in chapter 15 of book 9 of On Genesis according to the Letter; in which passage he says affirmatively that neither was the body of Eve from Adam's rib, nor the body of Adam himself from the dust of the earth, formed by the power of the Angels — although there Augustine does not deny that the Angels could have exhibited some ministry in the formation of the body of Adam or of Eve; but what that ministry may have been, “who,” he says, “would dare to affirm?” If, therefore, an Angel cannot generate any body except through the natural generating and effecting causes — and the natural efficient and forming cause of the human body is that wonderful force residing in the male seed, which in the schools they call the formative power — and this did not exist at all before the generation of the first man, so that it might be applied by the Angels: it is concluded, then, that the body of the first man could not have been formed by the Angels.3
NON tamen negaverim, potuisse Angelos ad eius corporis formationem aliquid ministrare: sed quod illud, aut quale fuit ministerium, Non audet quicquam statuere Augustinus: sed alij audentiores non dubitant dicere, collegisse pulverem Angelos, compegisse materiam, eamque in speciem & similitudinem humani corporis confor-[masse...]
Yet I would not deny that the Angels could have ministered something to the formation of that body; but what that was, or what kind of ministry it was, Augustine dares to establish nothing: whereas others, bolder, do not hesitate to say that the Angels gathered the dust, compacted the material, and conformed it into the form and likeness of the human body... [the word breaks here and is completed on the next page]4
[confor]masse atque figurasse: quam materiam humana specie figuratam Deum animasse ac vivificasse inspirando in eam animum rationalem. Sed ut ita factum sit, non est putandum tamen simulachrum illud corporis humani fictum & formatum ab Angelis, verè corpus humanum fuisse: non enim in eo erat talis mistio elementorum, taléque temperamentum quale corporis humani esse oportet: nec habebat carnes, ossa, nervos, viscera, nec calorem naturalem, nec spiritus animales & vitales, sine quibus rebus corpus humanum constare non potest. Quod si anima per mortem à corpore digressa, corpus quod remanet non est verè corpus hominis, sed tantùm aequivocè, cùm tamen substantiam carnis, ossis, aliarúmque partium retineat: quantò minùs dici potuit corpus hominis illud fictum & figuratum ab Angelis? quippe quod neque carnis, neque ossis, neque aliarum partium formas & naturas haberet.
...conformed and figured it; and that this material, figured into human shape, God animated and quickened by breathing into it a rational mind. But granting that it was done so, it is not to be supposed that that simulacrum of the human body, fashioned and formed by the Angels, was truly a human body: for there was not in it such a mixture of the elements, nor such a temperament, as a human body must have; nor did it have flesh, bones, sinews, inner organs, nor natural heat, nor the animal and vital spirits, without which things a human body cannot subsist. And if, when the soul departs from the body through death, the body that remains is not truly the body of a man but only equivocally so — even though it still retains the substance of flesh, of bone, and of the other parts — how much less could that thing fashioned and figured by the Angels be called the body of a man, seeing that it would have neither the forms nor the natures of flesh, of bone, or of the other parts?5

Translator’s notes

  1. Section divider (rule above). Second quaestio of this disputation on the formation of the first man.
  2. Augustine, de Gen. ad lit. 9.15 (no creature can create) and 8.24 (corporeal matter subject to the Angels' command) cited as the basis of the doubt.
  3. Augustine, de Gen. ad lit. 9.15. Marginal gloss: 'Angelos non fuisse effectores corporis humani' (that the Angels were not the makers of the human body). The 'virtus formativa' of the male seed is the scholastic natural efficient cause.
  4. Sentence breaks at the catchword 'confor' at the foot of the page; it is completed on PDF 454 as 'confor[masse] atque figurasse.'
  5. Completes the sentence broken at the catchword on PDF 453. Concludes QUAESTIO II: an angel-fashioned simulacrum lacks the elemental mixture, temperament, organs, natural heat, and vital spirits of a true body — a corpse is a body only 'aequivocally,' and the angelic figure even less so.